Ellis v. Tribune Television Co.

443 F.3d 71 (2006)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ellis v. Tribune Television Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
443 F.3d 71 (2006)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Tribune Television Company (Tribune) (defendant) owned a newspaper and two television stations in Hartford, Connecticut. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had a rule against cross-ownership of newspapers and television stations. To avoid violating the cross-ownership rule, Tribune applied for a temporary waiver of the rule in 2001 while it attempted to sell its television interests. The FCC renewed Tribune’s temporary waiver, and Tribune applied for a permanent waiver in 2002 because it could not sell its television interests. Tribune’s temporary waiver expired before the FCC ruled on Tribune’s permanent-waiver request. Neil Ellis (plaintiff), a Hartford resident, brought a case in federal district court seeking a declaration that Tribune was in violation of the cross-ownership rule. In 2005 the district court granted Ellis’s motion for summary judgment against Tribune and ordered Tribune to comply with the cross-ownership rule. A few weeks later, the FCC denied Tribune’s permanent waiver request but extended Tribune’s temporary waiver through 2007. Tribune appealed the district court’s decision, arguing that the FCC had primary jurisdiction over the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wesley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 826,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 991 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership