Elvin Associates v. Franklin

735 F. Supp. 1177 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Elvin Associates v. Franklin

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
735 F. Supp. 1177 (1990)

SC
Play video

Facts

Elvin Associates (Elvin) (plaintiff) sought to produce a musical. Ashton Springer, Elvin’s principal, asked Aretha Franklin (defendant) to star in the musical. Franklin told Springer that she was interested and that he should contact her agents. Springer did so, and contract negotiations ensued. Ultimately, Franklin’s agent orally agreed to Springer’s final proposal. Franklin began participating in preparations for the musical, including agreeing to tentative rehearsal and performance dates. Throughout the process, Franklin committed to and expressed enthusiasm for the performance. To prepare for the show, Springer reserved rehearsal space, hired a director, hired a technical crew, and hired set, lighting, and costume designers. Springer was in contact with Franklin throughout this planning phase. When rehearsals began, Franklin did not show up. Ultimately, although the parties had finalized the terms of their contract, the contract language required Franklin’s signature, and Franklin had never signed. Springer suspended production of the musical, and Elvin sued Franklin seeking to recover based on promissory estoppel.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Knapp, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership