Encon Utah, LLC v. Fluor Ames Kraemer, LLC
Utah Supreme Court
210 P.3d 263 (2009)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
In 2000, the state department of transportation (DOT) entered in a design-build contract with Fluor Ames Kraemer, LLC (FAK) (defendant) to construct a highway. In 2002, FAK subcontracted with Encon Utah, LLC (Encon) (plaintiff) for Encon to manufacture and install concrete bridge girders at a fixed price of $6,842,342. In 2003, the DOT partially terminated the design-build contract with FAK due to an injunction stopping the construction project. In May 2003, FAK sent Encon a notice of partial termination of the subcontract. Encon sued FAK to recover damages. The court held a bench trial and awarded Encon damages totaling $1,699,564 for the contract termination, prejudgment interest, and attorney fees. The trial court found that Encon’s damages were subject to mathematical calculation as of the contract-termination date. Further, FAK and Encon had agreed that it was reasonable for Encon to earn a 10 percent profit on its completed work. FAK appealed, challenging the award of prejudgment interest.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Durrant, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.