Endless Ocean v. Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin, & Quartararo
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
979 N.Y.S.2d 84 (2014)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Endless Ocean, LLC (plaintiff) engaged Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo (Twomey) (defendant) as legal counsel in a real estate transaction. Twomey advised Endless Ocean to place a portion of the sale proceeds in a comingled account, rather than an escrow account, with a qualified intermediary. The qualified intermediary then filed for bankruptcy, and the comingled account was frozen for years during the bankruptcy proceedings. As a result, Endless Ocean could not access the sale proceeds and could not purchase a replacement property within the time frame that would have allowed it to defer capital-gains taxes on the original sale. Endless Ocean sued Twomey for legal malpractice. Twomey filed a motion to dismiss, which the trial court granted. Endless Ocean appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mastro, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.