Enright v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Court of Appeals of New York
570 N.E.2d 198, 77 N.Y.2d 377, 568 N.Y.S.2d 550 (1991)
- Written by Michael Beverly, JD
Facts
Karen Enright’s (plaintiff) grandmother ingested the prescription drug DES while pregnant with Karen’s mother. Due to the ingestion, Karen’s mother developed abnormalities in her reproductive system which resulted in Karen’s premature birth. Karen suffered from cerebral palsy and other disabilities allegedly resulting from her premature birth. Karen's parents brought an action against DES manufacturers including Eli Lilly (defendants) on their own behalf and on behalf of Karen, asserting claims for negligence, breach of warranty, fraud, and strict products liability. The trial court dismissed the claims brought on Karen's behalf, but the appellate division reinstated Karen's strict-products-liability claim. Lilly and the other defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wachtler, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.