Entergy Services, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
35 F. Supp. 2d 746 (1999)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Union Pacific Railroad Co. (Union Pacific) (defendant) delivered coal to power plants owned by Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy) (plaintiff). The parties’ agreement provided that each month Entergy would inform Union Pacific of how much coal it needed, and Union Pacific would deliver the coal. The agreement obligated Union Pacific to make up any shortfalls within three months. The agreement had a liquidated-damages clause that stated that if Union Pacific committed a breach, it “shall” pay a certain amount in liquidated damages to compensate Entergy for obtaining an alternate supply of coal. The clause did not identify Union Pacific’s liquidated damages as the exclusive remedy available to Entergy. Union Pacific breached the contract, and Entergy sued, seeking liquidated damages and additional consequential damages. Both Entergy and Union Pacific moved for summary judgment. Union Pacific argued that Entergy was entitled to recover only liquidated damages. Entergy argued that it was not limited to a recovery of liquidated damages. The district court considered both parties’ motions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.