From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Entick v. Carrington
England and Wales Court of Common Pleas
19 Howell’s State Trials 1029 (1765)
Entick (plaintiff) sued Carrington and three other messengers (defendants) for trespass. After an informant claimed that Entick was involved in the publication of a seditious newspaper, a magistrate working for the earl of Halifax issued a warrant authorizing his messengers to search Entick’s home and seize his papers. Carrington and the other messengers searched Entick’s home for four hours, seized many of Entick’s books and papers, and then seized Entick. Entick sued the messengers for trespass.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Camden, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.