Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

465 F.2d 528 (1972)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
465 F.2d 528 (1972)

Facts

The nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. (EDF) petitioned the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the immediate suspension and cancellation of all registered uses of two pesticides: aldrin and dieldrin. The EDF also suggested that safer alternatives to aldrin and dieldrin were available for use. The EPA administrator declined to approve an order for suspension. This decision was based on the EPA’s conclusion that the pesticides posed no imminent hazards. However, rather than analyzing the positive benefits of aldrin and dieldrin, the EPA merely recited the pesticides’ uses. The EDF petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of the EPA’s refusal to order a suspension.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leventhal, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership