Ephrata School District v. County of Lancaster
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
886 A.2d 1169 (2005)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Lancaster County Agricultural Preserve (defendant) owned a negative easement over the property of David and Erma Lauver. The easement required the Lauvers to maintain the agricultural character of the land. The Ephrata School District (plaintiff) reached an agreement with the Lauvers to purchase a right-of-way over a 50-foot strip of their property. The school district planned to use the right-of-way as an access road for a new school that was to be constructed. The school district hoped to obtain the county’s approval of the right-of-way acquisition, or for the county to otherwise remove the 50-foot strip from its negative easement. The county declined to consent to the right-of-way acquisition. The school district brought suit, seeking an order that county approval was not required for the right-of-way. The county conceded prior to trial that that the school district’s proposed right-of-way would not interfere with its easement. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the county summary judgment. The school district appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.