Epstein v. Giannattasio
Connecticut Superior Court
197 A.2d 342 (1963)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Betty Epstein (plaintiff) sought a hair-coloring treatment from Giannattasio (defendant). The treatment involved a product, Zotos 30-day Color, manufactured by Sales Affiliates, Incorporated (defendant), and a prebleach product manufactured by Clairol, Incorporated (defendant). Epstein allegedly suffered acute dermatitis and disfigurement from hair loss as a result of the treatment she received from Giannattasio. Epstein brought claims for negligence and breach of warranty against Giannattasio, Sales Affiliates, and Clairol.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lugg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.