Equal Education and Others v. Minister of Basic Education

Case No. 22588/2020 (2020)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Equal Education and Others v. Minister of Basic Education

South Africa High Court
Case No. 22588/2020 (2020)

Facts

South Africa’s National School Nutrition Program (NSNP) was a long-term government program that provided over 45 million meals per week to school children from disadvantaged backgrounds. During the COVID-19 pandemic, when schools were closed, the government suspended the NSNP. It did, however, offer certain other benefits. It temporarily increased the monthly government child-support allowance and the old-age pension. It also implemented feeding schemes. The government claimed that during the first two months of lockdown, the feeding schemes delivered 788,000 food parcels. Nongovernmental organization Equal Education and others (plaintiffs) sued the minister of basic education and others (defendants), arguing that suspending the NSNP without implementing an effective substitute left many of the country’s children vulnerable to hunger and malnutrition, violating their basic right to food. The High Court of South Africa considered their request for emergency relief.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Potterill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 919,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 919,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 919,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership