Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. KarenKim, Inc.

698 F.3d 92 (2012)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. KarenKim, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
698 F.3d 92 (2012)

Facts

KarenKim, Inc. (defendant) was a New York grocery store owned by Karen Connors. Connors had a long-term romantic relationship with the store’s manager, Allen Manwaring. For years, Manwaring physically and verbally sexually harassed the store’s teenage, female employees. Despite employee complaints, Connors did nothing to address the situation. Eventually, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (plaintiff) sued KarenKim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), alleging that KarenKim had subjected female employees to unlawful sexual harassment. The jury held in the EEOC’s favor, awarding damages to 10 employees. By the end of trial, Manwaring no longer worked at KarenKim. However, he maintained his romantic relationship with Connors and was a produce supplier for the store. The EEOC moved to amend the judgment to include a 10-year injunction that: (1) prohibited KarenKim from maintaining a hostile work environment or retaliating against employees reporting Title VII violations, (2) prohibited KarenKim from rehiring Manwaring, (3) prohibited KarenKim from allowing Manwaring to enter the store, (4) required KarenKim to provide notices that Manwaring was barred from the store, (5) required KarenKim to hire an independent monitor to review its employment practices and complaints, and (6) authorized the EEOC to monitor KarenKim’s compliance with the injunction. The district court denied injunctive relief, concluding an injunction was not necessary because Title VII violations were unlikely to recur given that Manwaring no longer worked at the store and KarenKim had adopted an antidiscrimination policy. The EEOC appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership