Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. KarenKim, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
698 F.3d 92 (2012)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
KarenKim, Inc. (defendant) was a New York grocery store owned by Karen Connors. Connors had a long-term romantic relationship with the store’s manager, Allen Manwaring. For years, Manwaring physically and verbally sexually harassed the store’s teenage, female employees. Despite employee complaints, Connors did nothing to address the situation. Eventually, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (plaintiff) sued KarenKim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), alleging that KarenKim had subjected female employees to unlawful sexual harassment. The jury held in the EEOC’s favor, awarding damages to 10 employees. By the end of trial, Manwaring no longer worked at KarenKim. However, he maintained his romantic relationship with Connors and was a produce supplier for the store. The EEOC moved to amend the judgment to include a 10-year injunction that: (1) prohibited KarenKim from maintaining a hostile work environment or retaliating against employees reporting Title VII violations, (2) prohibited KarenKim from rehiring Manwaring, (3) prohibited KarenKim from allowing Manwaring to enter the store, (4) required KarenKim to provide notices that Manwaring was barred from the store, (5) required KarenKim to hire an independent monitor to review its employment practices and complaints, and (6) authorized the EEOC to monitor KarenKim’s compliance with the injunction. The district court denied injunctive relief, concluding an injunction was not necessary because Title VII violations were unlikely to recur given that Manwaring no longer worked at the store and KarenKim had adopted an antidiscrimination policy. The EEOC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

