Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. STME, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
938 F.3d 1305 (2019)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Kimberly Lowe (plaintiff) worked as a massage therapist for STME, LLC, known as Massage Envy-South Tampa (Massage) (defendant). Lowe requested time off to take a trip to visit her sister in Ghana, a West African country. Massage approved the request. However, three days before Lowe’s trip, Ronald Wuchko, one of Massage’s owners, told Lowe that she would be fired if she visited Ghana. Wuchko cited concern that Lowe might contract Ebola and bring it back to the United States. At the time, there was an Ebola epidemic in several countries near Ghana. However, Ghana itself was not experiencing an epidemic, and nothing suggested that Lowe’s sister had the disease. When Lowe refused to cancel her trip, Wuchko fired her. Lowe took her vacation and returned home Ebola-free. She filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (plaintiff), claiming that Massage violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by discriminating against her based on her potential to become disabled. The EEOC subsequently sued Massage, asserting (1) a discrimination claim arguing that Massage terminated Lowe because it regarded her as disabled and (2) an associational-discrimination claim arguing that Massage terminated Lowe because of her association with unidentified persons in Ghana whom Massage believed to be disabled by Ebola. The district court granted Massage’s motion to dismiss the claims, determining that neither claim was viable. The EEOC and Lowe, who had intervened in the suit, appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hull, J.)
Concurrence (Jordan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

