ESAB Group v. Centricut Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
126 F.3d 617, 523 U.S. 1048, 118 S.Ct. 1364, 140 L.Ed.2d 513 (1997)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The ESAB Group, Inc. (ESAB) (plaintiff), sued Centricut Inc. (Centricut) (defendant), a New Hampshire-based mail-order business and ESAB's competitor, in a South Carolina federal district court. ESAB claimed that Centricut purposefully intended to and did harm ESAB's South Carolina-based business, in violation of South Carolina law and the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Centricut claimed the court lacked personal jurisdiction to hear the case and moved to dismiss. Centricut showed that it never specifically targeted South Carolina customers, did not conduct substantial business activity in South Carolina, and had few customers in South Carolina. The court ruled that South Carolina's long-arm statute gave it personal jurisdiction to hear the case and denied Centricut's motion to dismiss. Centricut appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.