United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 478 (1964)
Danny Escobedo (defendant) was arrested on suspicion of murder. On the way to the police station he asked to speak to his lawyer. He asked the same many other times once inside the police station as well. Additionally, his lawyer was actually at the police station and asking to see Escobedo, but the police repeatedly refused this request as well. Meanwhile, the police had Di Gerlando, another suspect, in custody and Di Gerlando stated that Escobedo fired the fatal shots. During the interrogation of Escobedo, the police put Escobedo and Di Gerlando in the same room and during the confrontation, Escobedo implicated himself in the murder. The trial court convicted Escobedo and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goldberg, J.)
Dissent (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.