Eskanos & Adler, P.C. v. Leetien
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
309 F. 3d 1210 (2002)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Somkiat Leetien (debtor) filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on August 18, 2000. First Select, Inc. (Select) (creditor) received notice of Leetien’s petition on August 23. Eskanos & Adler, P.C. (Eskanos) was Select’s legal counsel and collection agent. On August 28, Eskanos filed a collection action on behalf of Select in California district court. On September 6, Eskanos received notice of Leetien’s bankruptcy petition. Eskanos dismissed the state collection action on September 29. Eskanos attributed the delay in dismissing the state action to problems with Eskanos’s process server. The bankruptcy judge jointly sanctioned Eskanos and Select for willfully violating the automatic stay in federal bankruptcy law. The district court affirmed. Eskanos appealed, arguing that there was no affirmative duty under federal bankruptcy law to discontinue postpetition state collection actions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hug, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.