Esso Australia Resources Ltd. v. Plowman
Australia High Court
21 Y.B. Comm. Arb. 137 (1996) [Austl. High Ct. 1995]
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
The Australian Minister for Manufacturing and Industry Development (the minister) (plaintiff) filed an action in Victoria Supreme Court against BHP Petroleum (BHP), Esso Australia Resources Ltd. (Esso), and two utility companies (defendants). BHP had previously arbitrated a dispute with one of the utility companies, and Esso had arbitrated a dispute with the other. The minister requested that the court decide whether information disclosed by BHP and Esso during the arbitrations with the utility companies was protected by confidentiality obligations. The court rejected BHP and Esso’s argument that the disclosed information was subject to strict confidentiality guidelines and ruled in favor of the minister. Esso and BHP appealed. The appellate court found that under the arbitration agreements the arbitrations were required to be private, but also held that there was no implied term guaranteeing that information disclosed during arbitration for purposes of the proceedings would remain confidential. Esso and BHP appealed to the Australia High Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mason, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.