Estate of Austin

113 Cal. App. 3d 167 (1980)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Austin

California Court of Appeal
113 Cal. App. 3d 167 (1980)

Facts

Lucille Austin executed a will giving her friend, Betty Guldberg (plaintiff), an oil painting and a promissory note under which Gary Grenz owed money to Austin. Austin’s will also made numerous specific legacies, i.e., gifts, and left Austin’s residuary estate to the Shrine Hospital for Crippled Children (the hospital) (defendant). Grenz paid off the promissory note’s balance early. Austin put this money, approximately $17,000, in a bank account that contained other funds. Austin then loaned $20,000 from that same account to the Inmans, again using a promissory note. After Austin’s death, the Inmans paid off their note, and the estate held the proceeds for distribution. Guldberg claimed that her gift of the Grenz note had changed form into the Inman note and that she was the beneficiary of the Inman note’s proceeds. However, the probate court found that the gift of the Grenz note had adeemed and that the residuary beneficiary, the hospital, should receive the Inman note’s proceeds. Guldberg appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Andreen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership