Estate of Williams v. Pasquotank County Parks & Recreation
North Carolina Supreme Court
732 S.E.2d 137, 366 N.C. 195 (2012)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
On June 10, 2007, Erik Dominic Williams drowned at Fun Junktion, a public park owned and operated by Pasquotank County and Pasquotank County Parks and Recreation (collectively, Pasquotank) (defendant). Williams’s estate (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in state court alleging that Williams had drowned as a result of Pasquotank’s negligence. Pasquotank filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it had governmental immunity from the lawsuit because the operation of Fun Junktion was a governmental function. The trial court denied Pasquotank’s motion. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court, holding that the operation of Fun Junktion was proprietary, not governmental. The court of appeals applied a four-part test to determine whether the function was governmental or proprietary, considering: (1) whether the function was traditionally performed by local governments, (2) whether the function could only be performed by a government or whether it could be performed by a private entity, (3) whether the governmental entity charged a substantial fee to perform the function, and (4) if a profit was made from the fee. The court of appeals explained that the second part of the test was the most important factor. The court of appeals found that public parks could be operated by a private entity and thus held that the operation of Fun Junktion was a proprietary function. Pasquotank appealed, highlighting the fact that § 160A-351 of the North Carolina General Statutes provided that the operation of parks and recreation programs was a governmental function for state and local governments.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timmons-Goodwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.