Estate of Williams v. Pasquotank County Parks & Recreation

732 S.E.2d 137, 366 N.C. 195 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Williams v. Pasquotank County Parks & Recreation

North Carolina Supreme Court
732 S.E.2d 137, 366 N.C. 195 (2012)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

On June 10, 2007, Erik Dominic Williams drowned at Fun Junktion, a public park owned and operated by Pasquotank County and Pasquotank County Parks and Recreation (collectively, Pasquotank) (defendant). Williams’s estate (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in state court alleging that Williams had drowned as a result of Pasquotank’s negligence. Pasquotank filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it had governmental immunity from the lawsuit because the operation of Fun Junktion was a governmental function. The trial court denied Pasquotank’s motion. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court, holding that the operation of Fun Junktion was proprietary, not governmental. The court of appeals applied a four-part test to determine whether the function was governmental or proprietary, considering: (1) whether the function was traditionally performed by local governments, (2) whether the function could only be performed by a government or whether it could be performed by a private entity, (3) whether the governmental entity charged a substantial fee to perform the function, and (4) if a profit was made from the fee. The court of appeals explained that the second part of the test was the most important factor. The court of appeals found that public parks could be operated by a private entity and thus held that the operation of Fun Junktion was a proprietary function. Pasquotank appealed, highlighting the fact that § 160A-351 of the North Carolina General Statutes provided that the operation of parks and recreation programs was a governmental function for state and local governments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Timmons-Goodwin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership