United States District Court for the Central District of California
2013 WL 6178986 (2013)
Ettlin (plaintiff) participated in protest events near Los Angeles City Hall as part of the national “Occupy” movement. Based on various police actions during the events, Ettlin brought suit in Los Angeles Superior Court against the Attorney General, judges, and the Los Angeles County Supervisors (defendants). Ettlin alleged federal civil rights violations, federal racketeering (RICO) violations, and related state law claims. The county supervisors removed the suit to federal court without the consent of the other defendants. Under the unanimity rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1446, if an action is removed pursuant to 1441(a), all defendants must consent to the removal. Ettlin filed a motion to remand the suit to state court based on the lack of unanimous consent among the defendants.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.