Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enterprises, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
639 F.3d 788 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Said and Nancy Ghusein (the Ghuseins) (plaintiffs) owned Eva’s Bridal Limited, a dress shop. The Ghuseins licensed the use of the “Eva’s Bridal” trademark to relatives, including Nayef Ghusein (Nayef) and his company, Halanick Enterprises, Inc. (defendant). The license agreement to Nayef did not require him to run his store in any particular way and did not retain any type of supervisory authority for the Ghuseins. Indeed, the Ghuseins acknowledged that they did not exercise any control over Nayef’s store. When the license agreement expired, Nayef continued to use the mark but stopped paying the royalties required under the agreement. The Ghuseins sued for trademark infringement. The district court dismissed the complaint, finding that the Ghuseins had abandoned the Eva’s Bridal mark by granting a naked license. The Ghuseins appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.