Evans v. Merriweather
Supreme Court of Illinois
3 Scam. (4 Ill.) 492 (1842)
- Written by Melanie Moultry, JD
Facts
Merriweather (plaintiff) and John Evans (defendant) owned adjoining properties that shared a stream. Merriweather’s property was located downstream from Evans’s property. Each property contained a steam mill and a well. Each steam mill depended upon the stream and a well to run the mill’s engine. Following a drought, the stream was insufficient to provide enough water to operate Evans’s mill. In order continue the mill’s operation, Evans’s laborer created a dam that diverted all the stream water to Evans’s well. As a result of the diversion, the portion of the stream that ran through Merriweather’s property went dry, and Merriweather’s mill could not run more than one day a week. Merriweather sued Evans for obstructing and diverting a water course. A verdict was entered in favor of Merriweather, who was awarded $150 in damages. Evans appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lockwood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
