United States Supreme Court
136 S. Ct. 1120 (2016)
The State of Texas (defendant) drew its legislative districts based on total population to ensure that each district contained the same number of people. Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger (plaintiffs) each lived in a Texas congressional district that had proportionally high numbers of people that were eligible and registered to vote. Evenwel and Pfenninger challenged the constitutionality of Texas’s districting practice in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Evenwel and Pfenninger argued that Texas’s districting based on total population as opposed to the voter-eligible population diluted their votes in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. The district court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim, and the United States Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
Concurrence (Alito, J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.