Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
E

Ex parte Ford

782 So. 2d 185 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ex parte Ford

Alabama Supreme Court
782 So. 2d 185 (2000)

Facts

Margaret Ford (plaintiff) suffered a neck injury and carpal-tunnel injury during her employment with Cagles, Inc. (defendant). Ford filed for workers’-compensation benefits and agreed to participate in a benefit-review conference with Cagles. In January 1998, during the conference, an agreement was signed by Ford, Cagles, and both counsel, which stated Ford would resign and withdraw her claim regarding the neck injury, and Cagles would pay Ford $11,000 in settlement of all claims relating to the carpal-tunnel injury. Ford did not like her attorney and changed her mind regarding the agreement. Cagles subsequently filed a motion to enforce the agreement. Ford hired a new attorney, who, more than 60 days later, objected to the motion and requested that the agreement be set aside. Neither party submitted the January 1998 agreement for court review within 60 days of signing. The trial court granted the motion to enforce the agreement. Ford appealed. The court of civil appeals affirmed the trial court without opinion. Ford filed a petition for certiorari review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (See, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Employment Law

Key Terms