Ex parte Fressola
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
27 U.S.P.Q.2d 1608 (1993)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Fressola (applicant) filed a utility patent application that included a general, “omnibus” claim that merely claimed the invention as disclosed in the specification and figures. The patent examiner rejected the claim under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶2 for “failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.” Fressola appealed the decision to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Serota, Chairman)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

