Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
24 F.3d 1545 (1994)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Donna Page filed a discrimination suit in state court against Executive Software North America, Inc. (Executive Software) (plaintiff). Page’s complaint contained two federal causes of action and three state causes of action. Executive Software removed the suit to federal court. The United States District Court of the Central District of California (District Court) (defendant) issued an order remanding the three state law claims to state court. In the order, the District Court outlined the requirements for exercising supplemental jurisdiction, from United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966), and 28 U.S.C. § 1367, but did not give any reasons why it was remanding the state law claims in this case. Executive Software then petitioned for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the District Court to retain jurisdiction over the state law claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)
Dissent (Leavy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.