Expanded Metal Co. v. Bradford
United States Supreme Court
214 U.S. 366, 29 S. Ct. 652, 53 L. Ed. 1034 (1909)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Expanded Metal Company (plaintiff) held a patent on an improved method of making expanded sheet metal. The patent claimed a process by which sheet metal could be simultaneously cut and expanded. Expanded Metal brought an infringement action in federal court. The trial court upheld the validity of the patent. The circuit court of appeals reversed, holding that patents claiming a process were only valid if the process was chemical in nature. The case was then appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Day, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.