Facebook v. Duguid

141 S. Ct. 1163 (2021)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Facebook v. Duguid

United States Supreme Court
141 S. Ct. 1163 (2021)

Play video

Facts

Noah Duguid (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Facebook (defendant) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (the TCPA), which sought to reduce unwanted contact from telemarketers. The TCPA restricted calls made using an autodialer. An autodialer was defined in the TCPA as equipment capable of “stor[ing] or produc[ing] telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator.” Facebook argued that both “store” and “produce” were modified by the phrase “using a random or sequential number generator.” Duguid argued that the phrase only modified the second verb, “produce,” and therefore the statute could be violated if numbers were stored even if they were not stored using a random- or sequential-number generator. The equipment used by Facebook did not store or produce numbers using a random- or sequential-number generator, although it did generally store phone numbers. Facebook filed a motion to dismiss the claims, which the district court granted. Duguid appealed, and the court of appeals reversed the district court’s dismissal. Facebook petitioned for, and was granted, a writ of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)

Concurrence (Alito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership