Logourl black

Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.

United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 474 (1933)


Facts

Fairmont Glass Works (Fairmont) (defendant) contracted to buy coal from Cub Fork Coal Company and Paragon Colliery Company (Cub) (plaintiffs). Cub sued Fairmont for breach of contract in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana under diversity jurisdiction and requested damages of $32,417 plus interest. Fairmont counterclaimed for $2,000 and raised several defenses. The jury returned a verdict for Fairmont. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded for a new trial due to legal errors. After the second trial, the jury’s verdict in favor of Fairmont was again reversed by the court of appeals. On remand, the jury in the third trial was instructed that Cub should be awarded the difference between the price stated in the contract and market value if Fairmont breached. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded damages of $1. Fairmont appealed the judge’s refusal to grant a new trial. The court of appeals reversed based on the inadequacy of the damage amount and concluded that at least $18,250 should be recoverable. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Brandeis, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Stone, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 73,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 10,395 briefs - keyed to 134 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now