Fajardo Shopping Center v. Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Puerto Rico

167 F.3d 1 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fajardo Shopping Center v. Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Puerto Rico

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
167 F.3d 1 (1999)

Facts

Fajardo Shopping Center (FSC) (plaintiff) was a three-building structure located in the municipality of Fajardo, Puerto Rico. FSC sustained significant damage during Hurricane Hugo. In particular, double-tee beams supporting the roof lost their structural integrity and collapsed. FSC was insured by Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Puerto Rico (SAIC) (defendant) at the time of the hurricane. SAIC advanced $150,000 for emergency repairs to FSC. FSC engaged an engineer to prepare an estimate of damages. The engineer concluded that 75,000 square feet of roof would need to be replaced and estimated the cost to be almost $1.5 million. FSC submitted the engineer’s report to SAIC. SAIC hired another engineer to complete an independent inspection. The SAIC engineer concluded that the damage was not due to the windstorm, but due to preexisting conditions that caused weakness in the beams. Based on the report of SAIC’s engineer, SAIC agreed to pay for limited repairs, totaling a little under $100,000 after applying credit for the prior emergency advance, the coinsurance, and the deductible. FSC undertook additional investigation to prove that the damage was caused by the hurricane and not by a preexisting latent defect. FSC submitted updated proof to SAIC, showing the damages to be close to $2 million. SAIC rejected the claim, and FSC filed suit to recover damages. SAIC argued that the damages were excluded under a clause in the insurance contract that excepted losses caused by faulty design, construction, and workmanship. The district court granted summary judgment on the issue of liability in favor of FSC, and SAIC appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership