Falzone v. Busch
Supreme Court of New Jersey
214 A.2d 12 (1965)
Falzone (plaintiff) was seated in a parked car while her husband was standing in a field next to the road. Busch’s (defendant) vehicle struck Falzone’s husband, and veered toward Falzone. Falzone was afraid for her safety. As a result of her fright, Falzone became ill. Falzone and her husband brought a negligence action. The trial court granted summary judgment for Busch on Falzone’s claim, finding that a plaintiff may not recover for bodily injury or sickness resulting from fright, absent a physical impact. The issue was certified directly to the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Proctor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.