Farmer v. Kentucky Utilities Co.
Supreme Court of Kentucky
642 S.W.2d 579 (1982)
Elva Farmer (plaintiff) owned a parcel of land on which Kentucky Utilities Co. (defendant) held a prescriptive easement. This easement permitted Kentucky Utilities Co. to hang electrical wires over Ms. Farmer’s land. In 1980, Kentucky Utilities Co. entered Ms. Farmer’s land to clear the brush and other trees and shrubs underneath its power lines, to avoid any interference. Ms. Farmer brought suit against Kentucky Utilities Co. for trespass. The trial court determined that Kentucky Utilities Co. did not have the right to enter Ms. Farmer’s land. Kentucky Utilities then appealed, with the court of appeals ruling that it may enter the land to repair and maintain its power lines over Ms. Farmer’s land. Ms. Farmer then petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sternberg, J.)
Dissent (Aker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.