Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of Golden
Colorado Supreme Court
272 P.2d 629, 129 Colo. 575 (1954)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
The City of Golden (the city) (plaintiff) purchased water rights relating to Clear Creek to augment the city’s domestic water supply. The city filed a petition with the court seeking to allow the city to change the diversion point for the water rights and change the nature of the water use from irrigation to general domestic use in the city. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Company (Farmers) (defendant), among others, opposed the proposed changes, arguing that the changes would impact their junior appropriative water rights. Whether the city’s proposed changes would adversely affect existing water rights, including Farmers’ water rights, was highly contested at trial. The trial court granted the city’s petition and authorized the changes sought with some conditions. Farmers appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.