Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Farmers Production Credit Association v. McFarland

Supreme Court of Iowa
374 N.W.2d 654 (1985)


Facts

Daniel and Linda McFarland (defendants) owned property subject to a senior mortgage held by American Federal Savings & Loan Associates (AFS) and a junior mortgage held by Production Credit Association (PCA) (plaintiff). PCA commenced foreclosure proceedings. Subsequently, AFS commenced foreclosure proceedings and obtained a judgment subject to PCA’s lien. AFS then purchased the property at a sheriff’s sale, subject to a six-month redemption period. The McFarlands had a three-month exclusive period to redeem the property. Within this three-month period, Dorothy McFarland, the McFarlands’ assignee, tendered a check to redeem the property. Approximately one month later, PCA tendered a check to redeem the property. Dorothy claimed her redemption extinguished PCA’s lien. The trial court found PCA was entitled to judgment on the McFarlands’ note and entitled to redeem the property from Dorothy. Daniel, Linda, and Dorothy McFarland appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Schultz, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Carter, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.