Fayetteville Public Library v. Crawford County
United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
684 F. Supp. 3d 879 (2023)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The Arkansas state legislature enacted a book-ban statute that (1) made it a crime to advertise or make a book available to a minor if the book was “harmful to minors” (§ 1) and (2) created a citizen-complaint process that allowed local elected officials to remove books with “inappropriate” content from public libraries (§ 5). Under the state’s caselaw, the term “harmful to minors” was defined broadly to include any book that referenced sex in any form, even nonobscene references. Multiple book providers, including the Fayetteville Public Library (collectively, the librarians) (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit in federal district court against a group responsible for enforcing the statute (defendants), alleging that the statute violated the First Amendment and seeking to stop its enforcement. The librarians pointed out that to avoid giving minors access to “harmful” books and committing a crime under § 1, the librarians would have to either completely remove all books with any sexual reference from their shelves or else completely ban minors from the buildings. The librarians also argued that § 5 was a vague and impermissible content-based restriction on protected speech because it allowed a few individuals to censor the entire community’s access to speech based on the individuals’ subjective beliefs about a book’s content. The librarians moved for a preliminary injunction preventing the statute’s enforcement during the lawsuit. The court considered the motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brooks, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 912,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,200 briefs, keyed to 997 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

