Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. v. McGinnis, Juban, Bevan, Mullins & Patterson, P.C.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
808 F. Supp. 1263 (1992)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
George Bevan was a partner in the law firm of McGinnis, Juban, Bevan, Mullins & Patterson, P.C. (McGinnis). Bevan had expertise in real estate matters. Sun Belt Federal Bank, F.S.B. (Sun Belt), hired Bevan to serve as closing attorney on a loan to Mande Cove, Inc., and paid McGinnis legal fees in connection with the closing. Mande Cove defaulted on the loan. Sun Belt was declared insolvent, and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) (plaintiff) was appointed receiver. The FSLIC sued Bevan as well as McGinnis and its insurance carrier (collectively, the McGinnis parties) (defendants) claiming that if Bevan had not breached his fiduciary duty, Sun Belt would not have made the loan or would have restructured it. The FSLIC alleged that Bevan performed a negligent title search on the collateral, intentionally or negligently failed to inform Sun Belt’s disinterested officers and directors that the loan would violate the federal one-borrower regulation because Mande Cove’s principals intended to use the loan proceeds to pay past-due interest on prior Sun Belt loans, and failed to inform Sun Belt’s disinterested officers and directors that Bevan was representing the Mande Cove principals in past loans while also acting as Sun Belt’s closing attorney. The McGinnis parties moved for summary judgment, seeking an order that McGinnis was not vicariously liable for Bevan’s intentional or fraudulent torts or breach of fiduciary duty. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which succeeded to FSLIC’s interest as plaintiff, cross-moved for summary judgment, seeking an order that McGinnis was vicariously liable for all of Bevan’s alleged wrongdoing.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Feldman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.