Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. v. McGinnis, Juban, Bevan, Mullins & Patterson, P.C.

808 F. Supp. 1263 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. v. McGinnis, Juban, Bevan, Mullins & Patterson, P.C.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
808 F. Supp. 1263 (1992)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

George Bevan was a partner in the law firm of McGinnis, Juban, Bevan, Mullins & Patterson, P.C. (McGinnis). Bevan had expertise in real estate matters. Sun Belt Federal Bank, F.S.B. (Sun Belt), hired Bevan to serve as closing attorney on a loan to Mande Cove, Inc., and paid McGinnis legal fees in connection with the closing. Mande Cove defaulted on the loan. Sun Belt was declared insolvent, and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) (plaintiff) was appointed receiver. The FSLIC sued Bevan as well as McGinnis and its insurance carrier (collectively, the McGinnis parties) (defendants) claiming that if Bevan had not breached his fiduciary duty, Sun Belt would not have made the loan or would have restructured it. The FSLIC alleged that Bevan performed a negligent title search on the collateral, intentionally or negligently failed to inform Sun Belt’s disinterested officers and directors that the loan would violate the federal one-borrower regulation because Mande Cove’s principals intended to use the loan proceeds to pay past-due interest on prior Sun Belt loans, and failed to inform Sun Belt’s disinterested officers and directors that Bevan was representing the Mande Cove principals in past loans while also acting as Sun Belt’s closing attorney. The McGinnis parties moved for summary judgment, seeking an order that McGinnis was not vicariously liable for Bevan’s intentional or fraudulent torts or breach of fiduciary duty. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which succeeded to FSLIC’s interest as plaintiff, cross-moved for summary judgment, seeking an order that McGinnis was vicariously liable for all of Bevan’s alleged wrongdoing.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Feldman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership