From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Feliciano v. Rosemar Silver Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
401 Mass. 141, 514 N.E.2d 1095 (1987)
Marcial and Dolores Feliciano (plaintiffs) lived together for 20 years although they were not legally married. During that time, Dolores used Marcial’s last name and they held themselves out as husband and wife, including filing joint tax returns, jointly owning their home, and maintaining a sexual relationship to the exclusion of others. In 1981, Marcial was injured by the acts of Miguel Costa (defendant) while they were both employed by Rosemar Silver Company (Rosemar) (defendant). In 1983, Marcial and Dolores were legally married. Subsequently, Marcial and Dolores filed suit against Rosemar and Costa for loss of consortium. The trial court granted Rosemar’s motion for summary judgment and the Felicianos appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.