Ferrari v. E-Rate Consulting Services

655 F. Supp. 2d 1194 (2009)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Ferrari v. E-Rate Consulting Services

United States Court of Appeals for the Middle District of Alabama

655 F. Supp. 2d 1194 (2009)

Facts

Shannon Ferrari (plaintiff) was an employee of E-Rate Consulting Services (E-Rate) (defendant) and thus of Jonathan Slaughter (defendant), E-Rate’s sole owner. Ferrari quit her job on July 27, 2007. On January 10, 2008, Ferrari filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). On January 12, E-Rate and Slaughter filed suit against Ferrari in state court, asserting claims for libel and slander, false light, and intentional interference with contractual or business relations. On February 14, Ferrari filed her answer. On November 16, Ferrari received a notice of her right to sue from the EEOC. On January 21, 2009, Ferrari filed suit against E-Rate and Slaughter in federal court, asserting claims under Title VII for sexual harassment, constructive termination, and retaliation, as well as assault and battery and outrage under Alabama law. On February 16, Slaughter and E-Rate filed virtually identical motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing Ferrari’s suit was barred by the compulsory-counterclaim rule.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fuller, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership