Fields v. City of Philadelphia
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
862 F.3d 353 (2017)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Amanda Geraci (plaintiff) attended a protest as a legal observer. While there, Geraci attempted to film an officer arresting a protester. Although Geraci was not interfering with the arrest, another officer physically pushed her up against a pillar and held her there for one to three minutes, preventing her from filming the other officer’s conduct. The officer did not cite Geraci for anything. In a separate incident, college student Richard Fields (plaintiff) witnessed police activity at a house party. Standing on a public sidewalk across the street, Fields photographed the scene with his phone. An officer asked Fields if he liked “taking pictures of grown men” and told Fields to leave. When Fields did not leave, the officer arrested Fields, confiscated the phone, and searched through photos and videos before returning it. The officer ticketed Fields for obstructing a public passage, but the charges were dropped when the officer did not appear at the hearing. Geraci and Fields brought 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the City of Philadelphia (city) (defendant), alleging that the officers had (1) retaliated against them for exercising their First Amendment right to record police officers performing their duties in public and (2) violated their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The district court granted summary judgment to the city on the First Amendment claims. Geraci and Fields appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ambro, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 924,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

