Finley v. Marathon Oil Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
75 F.3d 1225, 137 O. & G.R. 10 (1996)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Finleys (plaintiffs) leased oil and gas rights on their land to Marathon Oil Company (Marathon) (defendant). A tract of land owned by the heirs of McCroskey was adjacent to the Finley leasehold. The subsurface formation containing the Finleys’ oil extended to under the McCroskey land. The Finleys brought suit against Marathon for breach of the implied covenant to protect against drainage and for breach of fiduciary duty. In support of their claim, the Finleys presented evidence that Marathon’s water-injection method of extracting oil had caused oil to drain from the Finley leasehold onto the McCroskey land. Marathon objected to this evidence and presented its own evidence that there was no recoverable oil in the portion of the Finley leasehold into which Marathon had injected the water. The district court found in favor of Marathon on both claims. The Finleys appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.