First National Bank and Trust Co. of Williston v. Scherr

467 N.W.2d 427 (1991)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

First National Bank and Trust Co. of Williston v. Scherr

North Dakota Supreme Court
467 N.W.2d 427 (1991)

RW

Facts

The brothers and business partners Albinus and Pius Scherr (defendants) opened a checking account for the partnership at First National Bank and Trust Company of Williston (bank) (plaintiff). On the account signature card, the Scherrs indicated that the signature of either brother would be sufficient to bind the partnership in any transaction with the bank. The Scherrs later signed a partnership agreement barring either brother from lending or borrowing money for the partnership without the other brother’s consent. The bank requested a copy of the partnership agreement, which the bank retained in its files. Pius, acting for the partnership but without Albinus’s knowledge or consent, subsequently borrowed $65,000 from the bank. When the partnership defaulted on the loan, the bank sued both the partnership and the Scherrs for repayment. North Dakota’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) applied to the case. The trial court entered summary judgment for the bank but was partially reversed on appeal. On remand, the trial court dismissed the bank’s claims against the partnership and Albinus. The bank appealed to the North Dakota Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Meschke, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership