First National Bank v. National Exchange Bank
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 122 (1875)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Under the National Bank Act, national banks had the authority to exercise all incidental powers necessary to carry on the business of banking. First National Bank of Charlotte (First National) (plaintiff) issued a certificate of deposit to Bayne. Bayne transferred the certificate of deposit to National Exchange Bank (National Exchange) (defendant) as collateral for a debt Bayne owed to National Exchange Bank. Bayne did not disclose the transfer to First National, and he collected the money due on the certificate of deposit from First National. As a result, any payment made by First National to National Exchange Bank with respect to the certificate of deposit became an enforceable obligation against Bayne. First National sued National Exchange. The court of appeals held that a bank may accept stock for payment and satisfaction of a debt. First National appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Waite, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.