First Savings & Loan Association v. Vandygriff
Texas Court of Civil Appeals
605 S.W.2d 740 (1980)
- Written by Nicole Gray , JD
Facts
In March 1979, the Savings and Loan Commissioner of Texas, L. Alvis Vandygriff (defendant) granted a charter for Citizens Security Savings and Loan Association (Citizens) to be located in Borger, Texas. The commissioner’s order granting the charter followed a denial of an earlier application for it, which was filed by a group of organizers (defendants) in 1978. The commissioner overruled the organizer’s motion to rehear the initial denial in August 1978, so five of the organizers visited the commissioner in Austin that September to provide a different view of the economic conditions related to the charter. In October 1978, the organizers filed the application that resulted in the charter, leaving the capital funds from the first application on deposit and submitting some of the same supporting documentation. One of the organizers expressed the view that the second application was ongoing from the first. First Savings and Loan Association of Borger, Texas (First Savings & Loan) (plaintiff) challenged the commissioner’s order granting the charter in state district court, having been an interested party to the organizers’ initial application but excluded from the meeting between the commissioner and the organizers. First Savings & Loan argued that the meeting was an unlawful ex parte communication despite the commissioner’s admission of the meeting in his order and declaration that the decision was based only upon the administrative record. The district court found in favor of the commissioner, and First Savings & Loan filed a motion for rehearing.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shannon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.