Flagship Bank of Orlando v. Reinman, Harrell, Silberhorn, Moule & Graham, P.A.

503 So. 2d 913 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Flagship Bank of Orlando v. Reinman, Harrell, Silberhorn, Moule & Graham, P.A.

Florida District Court of Appeal
503 So. 2d 913 (1987)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Land promotors purchased three separate tracts of land in Florida. The promoters then created a land trust for the parcels and sold beneficial interest shares to members of the public. However, when the promoters transferred title to the land parcels to the trust, they retained a portion of each parcel for their own benefit (the retained land). Subsequently, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) filed an action against the promotors for securities-law violations and sought to have the promotors return the retained land to the trust. The federal trial court appointed Flagship Bank of Orlando (plaintiff) as the successor trustee and receiver. The promotors then failed to pay taxes on the retained land, and the state held a tax deed sale to recover the taxes. Flagship’s petition to stay the tax deed sale was denied, but the federal court authorized Flagship to redeem the tax certificates and thereby recover the retained land for the trusts. Flagship failed to redeem the tax certificates, and the retained land was sold to third parties. Reinman, Harrell, Silberhorn, Moule & Graham, P.A. (Reinman) (defendant) then replaced Flagship as the trustee. Subsequently, the federal court held that the trusts were entitled to the retained land and ordered Flagship to pay damages to Reinman, as trustee, equal to the market value of the lost land at the time of trial. Flagship appealed, arguing that (1) the trust instrument did not explicitly include a duty to protect the retained land from tax deed sale; and (2) because it did not act in bad faith, the proper measure of damages was the market value of the land at the time of the tax deed sale, not at the time of trial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cowart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership