From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Flamm v. American Association of University Women
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
201 F.3d 144 (2000)
The American Association of University Women and the AAUW Legal Advocacy Fund (AAUW) (defendants) compiled and distributed a directory listing the names and contact information of 275 attorneys and specialists willing to consult with women in discrimination cases. The entry for Flamm (plaintiff) contained the only negative comment in the directory, stating that at least one plaintiff had described Flamm and an “ambulance chaser” only interested in “slam dunk cases.” Flamm sued, claiming this description constitutes libel per se. The district court granted AAUW’s motion to dismiss, finding that the statement could not reasonably be found to be a statement of objective fact. Flamm appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Meskill, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.