Flores v. Sessions
United States District Court for the Central District of California
394 F. Supp. 3d 1041 (2017)
- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Jenny Flores and other individuals (plaintiffs) (collectively, Flores) who were detained at United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities filed a class action against United States Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions and assorted federal government agencies (defendants), arguing that ICE facilities at United States borders forced detainees to live in deplorable and unsanitary conditions. The parties executed a settlement agreement under which the government agreed to enforce certain standards of living at its facilities, including “safe and sanitary” environments. Flores later filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement, claiming that the government had violated the “safe and sanitary” requirement in the agreement. In support of the motion, Flores provided evidence from many detainees, all reporting that the government failed to provide adequate access to bathrooms, drinking water, reasonable temperatures, and ventilation, among other issues. In response, the government referred the court to its policies and practices, which stated that items like drinking water would be provided, but it gave no evidence that these items were actually provided to detainees on a regular basis. In addition, one section of the settlement agreement provided for a coordinator from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to monitor compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement, but the government provided no evidence of any person holding that job. Flores asked that the court appoint an independent monitor to report on the government’s deficiencies and ensure ongoing compliance with the settlement agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.