Foradori v. Harris
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
523 F.3d 477 (2008)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Michael Foradori (plaintiff) sued Garious Harris (defendant) in Mississippi state court for injuries Foradori sustained when one of Harris’s employees assaulted him. The case was removed to federal court. Under Mississippi law, proof that medical bills were paid or incurred served as prima facie evidence that such bills were necessary and reasonable. Foradori presented medical bills to support his claim for damages. Harris objected, contending that the bills were unauthenticated and hearsay and that Foradori lacked personal knowledge of their contents. The trial court admitted the bills, holding that under Federal Rule of Evidence 302, Mississippi’s rules of evidence controlled. The jury found for Foradori, and Harris appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dennis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 929,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

