Ford Motor Company v. Federal Trade Commission

120 F.2d 175 (1941)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ford Motor Company v. Federal Trade Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
120 F.2d 175 (1941)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Ford Motor Company (Ford) (defendant) allowed customers to purchase automobiles on an installment plan that Ford called the six-percent plan. Competing automobile manufacturers, including General Motors and Chrysler, also used identical six-percent plans. Under the plan, the total cost of the customer’s automobile was calculated by multiplying the unpaid balance and insurance costs by half of a percent each month. For example, if a $643 car was sold to a customer who paid a $243 down payment, making the unpaid balance $400, and the customer was charged $15 for insurance, the $415 would be multiplied by half of a percent each month for the loan period. If the customer entered a plan to pay off the automobile in a year, the total cost was determined by multiplying the unpaid balance by 6 percent—half of a percent per month for 12 months. In advertisements for the six-percent plan, Ford specified that the financing was not the same as being charged an annual 6 percent interest rate and represented that the six-percent plan was cheaper than other interest-based payment plans. In fact, under the six-percent plan, customers were charged an approximately 11.5 percent annual interest rate. This discrepancy occurred because, unlike in a simple interest arrangement in which the monthly fee is calculated by multiplying the interest rate against the declining unpaid balance, the six-percent plan multiplied the rate against the initial unpaid balance for each month’s payment. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) charged Ford with violating § 5 of the FTC Act by misleading consumers about its six-percent plan. The FTC reasoned that the consumers were deceived about the price of their automobile purchases under the plan because consumers were likely to believe that the plan charged an annual 6 percent interest rate. The FTC issued a cease-and-desist order against Ford, enjoining Ford from advertising its six-percent payment plan. Ford appealed, arguing that its six-percent plan and related advertisements were standard practice in the automobile industry.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership