From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Forestal Guarani Sociedad Anonima v. Daros International Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
613 F.3d 395 (2010)
Forestal Guarani S.A. (Forestal) (plaintiff), an Argentinian company, orally agreed to sell wooden finger joints to Daros International, Inc. (Daros) (defendant), a New Jersey company. Daros failed to pay after receiving the finger joints. Forestal sued for breach of contract in New York state court, and Daros removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The district court granted summary judgment for Daros, finding that the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) required a written contract. Forestal appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.