Fortress Systems, LLC v. Bank of the West
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
2008 WL 64690 (2008)
- Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Facts
Fortress Systems, LLC (Fortress) (plaintiff) sought equipment financing from Bank of the West (Bank) (defendant). The Bank told Fortress that if it adhered to the Bank’s requirements, then the loan would be approved. The loan terms were documented in a commitment letter, and the loan was set to close. However, the Bank subsequently learned that Fortress was in the midst of a shareholder litigation suit. The loan closing was stalled. However, the Bank indicated that if the lawsuit was settled, then the loan would close. The Bank continued to request financial information from Fortress, and Fortress entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the parties to the shareholder litigation suit. Fortress also entered into a building contract based on the belief that the loan would close, and Fortress invested its own money in the construction per the Bank’s requirements. The Bank then told Fortress that it would not fund the loan. Fortress sued the Bank for promissory estoppel, and the jury returned specific factual findings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bataillion, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.